| |
General Education Outcomes
|
About the GEOs Assessment Plan
|
- Motivation for
our GEO Plan
- it’s an expectation for
accreditation
- it helps us
to measure our institutional
effectiveness relative to fulfilling
Mt. SAC’s stated GE philosophy
- GEOs
assessment could help us to make
course-level improvements and
improvements to our GE curriculum
that will boost student learning
and success
- it will help
us to meet Academic Senate approved
SLO objectives, as well, since
our plan involves the adoption
of approximately 300 new SLOs
at the course level
- The relationship
between the SLO and GEO process
- GEOs are just SLOs that
occur on a broader level – within
our General Education Areas.
GEOs will cross departmental
and disciplinary boundaries
- We
will be using the now familiar
SLO model to measure our GEOs
at Mt. SAC, with a few minor
modifications that will reflect
the college level nature of this
assessment. One difference is
that GEOs assessment will require
more coordination and interdisciplinary
cooperation than necessary for
SLOs
- Instead of faculty agreeing
on an SLO that will be applied
to all sections of one course,
we will now need to reach agreement
on an SLO for all courses in
a required GE area - courses
which already share common themes
and objectives.
- How faculty
can help implement the GEO Plan
- Our
plan involves getting together
“workgroups” of faculty from
each of the Mt. SAC GE areas
to meet and agree on
at least one SLO statement that
could be adopted by all courses
in their GE area. This outcome
will then be both a course level
SLO and a college level GEO
- We
are starting with two pilot groups
in Fall 2008, GE areas D-1 and
E
- We are looking for people
to represent those courses/disciplines
at a workgroup meeting to compose
the GEO statement for their area.
We also need attendees to come
to a shared understanding of
what student achievement of the
stated learning outcome means.
Anyone may attend these meetings,
but we really need one representative
from each discipline, at a minimum
- The GEO committee will
be on hand for the workgroup
sessions as consultants to offer
support, including sample GEOs
that other colleges have adopted
in the same general education
areas, and sample rubrics that
detail levels of student competency
for a given outcome as a means
of determining student learning
of that outcome
- Our institutional
requirement is to assess our
GEOs in time for our self-study
report, so we need to conduct
assessments by the end of the
spring 2009 semester
- The
GEO that is created will be adopted
at the course level for every
course in the GE area, so it
will also count toward our college
goal of two SLOs on every course
by the end of the academic year.
- Why
faculty should help implement
the GEO Plan
- We know that
this creates some additional
work for disciplines with courses in
our GE
- Those disciplines
do benefit tremendously from
having GE courses – in many cases
they are our “bread and butter”
and keep us all employed. This
process allows us to document
the value of our courses
in the GE curriculum
and to the college
as a whole
- This isn’t optional
– it’s something we must do.
At some schools, their solution
has been to create standardized
exams or other tools and come
into people’s classrooms to measure
student’s knowledge and ability
without involvement of faculty
in the discipline. We decided
this was a bad idea, and that
faculty should control the process
at Mt. SAC – and maintain control
of how students are assessed
in our classrooms
- To retain
that right, we, as faculty, must
also accept the responsibility
of being involved in this process. The
GEO Committee
will
do everything
we can to make it as easy and
painless as possible!
|
| |
|
|
General Ed Outcomes Links
Communications
Additional Resources
|
| |
|